Back to Top
Someone asked: Do you have any tips for a scatterbrained animator? A lot of the time I'll get burned out on a wip or start a new one and lose interest and I really would like To Not Do That

Unfinished projects! Every animator I know seems to have a couple of these. But that I feel is a pretty new occurrence, because animation, for most of its history, has been too expensive. Animation is overwhelmingly produced in commercial settings, and has been done so since very shortly after someone figured out how to do it at all. This generally means, a person with money was pitched a largely complete idea, decided it was potentially profitable, and paid someone money to hire labour to get the idea made. And what we think of as “independent animation”, has for the longest time not been that different. The process still usually required a lot of materials and equipment as well as labour, and so the old indie animators would put together pitch documents, shop around for investors, and then when they tour the festivals they would still have 50 names in the credits. They’re still at the festivals doing this now, and still aren’t quite aware of just how much the landscape is shifting.

But it is shifting! Commercial animators often now work from home with their equipment around at all times, or everything they need fits into a backpack and goes home with them. Kids who want to be animators don’t learn the ropes in an internship, they get a cheap tablet and some free software on the family computer and start by figuring it out. We have cameras in our phones!!!! Now when someone has something they want to make, they don’t need to write a proposal, they just need to open a new file.

But! While painters have unfinished paintings, authors have unfinished books, and composers have unfinished symphonies for all the same reasons that plague every artist, animators have an additional hurdle:
Animation sucks and nobody wants to do it!

And I don’t mean its hard- all art is hard. I mean the way we’ve been trained to break down the task of animation, the globally accepted “how to animate”, was not written for artists to explore their own creativity. It’s written for a commercial pipeline. And the pipeline seems pretty functional and useful at first! Animation is a multifaceted task, and dividing it into smaller tasks makes the whole thing easier to grapple. But the particular divisions at play are a hierarchy, with creativity at the top and labour at the bottom.

For instance, say you start by coming up with an idea. Wow that was fun! Very creatively gratifying, not so much work though. Then you might make designs, which involves drawing- a bit more work, but you get to come up with a lot of the fun details. Then storyboards- a fair few drawings, and while the bulk of the “idea” has been determined, you get to decide the specifics in how it plays out. Then on to key animation! Quite a lot of work, and pretty much all of the decision making has already been done, but you get to put in the little flourishes of the acting, focus on the minutia. And then in-betweens! Unrewarding, never-ending, gruelling work.
In most commercial contexts yes, these steps I listed might be the chronological order of production, but it’s also the ascending order of department size and workload, and descending order of creative input, and pay.

Which begs the question: Why would anyone do this for no money, as their personal project? Why would anyone regularly put aside several hours at a time to perform a task about as stimulating as washing dishes, in order to make a fun idea they had 6 months ago they don’t even know if they like anymore? Of course nobody finishes their personal projects, we’ve made it as awful as possible! But we keep doing it, because it’s the way we know how.

But if there’s no investor who needs to approve each step of production, and if there’s no director who has a grand vision that needs to be upheld at the expense of the people making the work, then this way of approaching animation is completely arbitrary. Everything about it! Pre-planning everything is for the sake of reassuring the money, detailed rough passes are so teams don’t get confused. The whole notion of pose-to-pose animation and “strong key poses” has NOTHING to do with how movement actually works- it’s to condense the decision making to fewer drawings, so that whoever does the drawings in-between is replaceable, and can therefore be paid (and treated) like rubbish. You shouldn’t have to do that and say it’s for yourself.

So, however you personally work best, I can’t really say. Unless you’re an entire production company wearing a massive trenchcoat, probably not the usual way. Personally, I often like to come up with an isolated scene, and then try and think up the next scene while I’m making the first one. I get to keep adding new ideas, and I find the whole undertaking a lot less scary when I have no idea how big it is until it’s done.
But obviously you’re not me either, so who knows. But, you are part of a new generation of animators, who can just sit in a room by themselves with a bunch of art supplies and just figure themselves out, like neurotic starving artists have been doing for centuries. Have fun with it!

such exquisite markings

such exquisite markings

Oh gosh oh heck I’m making a thing again. One where I don’t know what I’m doing and nobody pays me, one of those things. Anyway here’s a decorative water feature for a background, of the classic motif “Naked European Gives The Ol’ St. George To This...

Oh gosh oh heck I’m making a thing again. One where I don’t know what I’m doing and nobody pays me, one of those things. Anyway here’s a decorative water feature for a background, of the classic motif “Naked European Gives The Ol’ St. George To This Weird Animal He Found”

warm in the walls

warm in the walls

Check out the new MV I worked on for Childish Gambino!

I was the preproduction boy: I did all the storyboards, and most of the animatic. I was also part of the animation crew and, among other things, did all of these hand-drawn shadow effects in the choruses! Directed by Ivan Dixon @pug-of-war, and made by a lot of cool friends

brushy

brushy

Oh no don’t get spooked, it’s a new music video for Cypress Hill!
Animated + directed by me, backgrounds by my partner in crime Trugglet, music by Cypress Hill, obviously

Someone asked: Hello!!! I have been a fan of your work for a couple of months! I really love how your animations have so much deep criticism without talking about the actual target of criticism. By watching your Youtube videos is easy to notice a change of style somewhere between man spaghetti and elephant garden. Before that your work is direct with its crude reality, and after is much more bright and harmonic and abstract. I wanted to know ¿How can you explain that change?

Hello, and thank you! None of my films so far have been judgemental allegories or even conclusive statements, but earnest open-ended explorations of themes and ideas I’m interested in, so any deep criticism you detect is likely a personal interpretation. Which is great, I love that people’s experience of art can be so personal- I just like to clarify when it comes up, since people have projected some pretty bizarre ideas onto my work over the years and confidently attributed them to me.

The tonal shift of Elephant’s Garden was just an artistic re-evaluation as I got older. I was 19 when I made Man Spaghetti, and all artistic progress leading up to it had been made by an angsty teenager. I was ready for a change because my work didn’t feel like me anymore, but it was the visual language that I’d developed and had at my disposal, so I made Man Spaghetti as one last hurrah. I boiled down the tropes of my output at the time to what felt, to me, like its most important traits. Confronting, visceral, dense, comical. Everything else about my work up until then was a hangover from the past or a vehicle for those other parts. And as much as I started to broaden my artistic vocabulary with Elephant’s Garden, and as much as the overall tone was different, all of those traits were still very present, and still show up in most of my work today.

And it’s worth noting that this was just a change in visual language, not the ideas the language was expressing. Both Man Spaghetti and Elephant’s Garden were brought on by my obsessions with animals, and the brutal and unceremonious, but completely intrinsic and necessary role of death in the natural world. Man Spaghetti was much more indirect and could only deal with the ‘existential panic’ part because those were the skills I’d developed, and for Elephant’s Garden I needed to learn to slow down and look closely, so you could smell the flowers before I killed them.

Hello! My short film DRY RUN, originally made for Adult Swim’s Off The Air, is now on YouTube all by itself! Watch it again, or for the first time, or not at all whatever I’m not your Dad

THEME BY PARTI